Internal methods — transparency artifacts

These are working documents, not physics. They are the tooling used to build and verify the anchors section — kept public on purpose. A framework that claims its results were produced under a fixed, checkable discipline should let you inspect the discipline itself: the templates its pages are built from and the completion checks each page had to pass. Nothing here adds evidence for any physics claim; the physics closure-of-record is the gate board, and every number on the content pages carries its own provenance link.

The documents

• Gate traceability — method & template — the reusable per-gate ledger method: how each gate page traces every anchor up to a master anchor and a deep root, and the completion-test table each gate page must fill in.
• Page-completion protocol — how each page in this section was decomposed into atomic, test-verified tasks and checked before publication.

Why publish tooling at all? The same reason the refuted-claims register is public: a process built so that cheating would be visible is worth showing. If the discipline described here and the pages it produced ever disagree, the discrepancy itself is checkable — and reportable.